Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1989No. 87-5992PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

866 F.2d 172

Jerry HAMMOND, Plaintiff,

Jane Allen Offutt and William N. Offutt, IV, M.D.,

Intervening Plaintiffs- Appellants,

v.

Charlotte BALDWIN, Mary Helen Miller, Donald F. Harker, Jr.,

in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees,

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, USA, Inc., Intervening

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-5992.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued July 26, 1988.

Decided Jan. 18, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 3, 1989.

Theodore E. Cowen, Miller, Griffin and Marks, Lexington, Ky., Robert S. Miller (argued), for intervening plaintiffs-appellants.

Eric L. Ison…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Brooks v. New Hampshire Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Coles v. GranvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. In Re Credit Acceptance Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. In Re Kindred Healthcare, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API