State Farm Lloyds v. Nicolau
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice
in which CORNYN, ENOCH, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, join.
This cause presents several questions about an insurer’s liability for extracontrac-tual damages. The court of appeals upheld jury findings of bad faith and malice, allowing the insureds to recover both mental anguish and exemplary damages. 869 S.W.2d 543. We agree that some evidence supports the jury’s finding that the insurer violated its duty of good faith and fair dealing. In addition, we hold that there is no evidence that the insurer acted unconscionably or with malice. Because the latter holding eliminates the Nicolaus’ recovery…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Lyons v. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- Balandran v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Provident American Insurance Co. v. CastañedaTexas Supreme Court · 1999
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.