Legal Opinion

Cross v. Leonard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by William and Herman Cross, copartners as Cross Brothers, against George E. Leonard for money had and received. From a judgment for the defendant, plaintiffs appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This action was brought by William Cross and Herman Cross, copartners doing business under the name of Cross Brothers, against the defendant, for money due amounting to $49.81, before one of the justices of the peace for the city of Detroit. The plaintiffs declared orally upon all the common counts, while defendant pleaded in abatement. The case was tried by the justice, who rendered judgment of no cause- of action because plaintiffs had failed to file a certificate, as is required by Act No. 101 of the Public Acts of 1907 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 2626 et seq.), in the case of copartnerships…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Winget v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Rossello v. TrellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Zemon v. TrimMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. BiossatMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Carland v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API