Ex Parte Haase
California Court of Appeal
HEARING on writ of habeas corpus addressed to the warden of the state prison, holding petitioner under a judgment of conviction in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. B. P. Bledsoe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioner asks to be discharged from the custody of the warden of the state prison on the ground that the "judgment and sentence were and are void, that said court had no authority in law to enter said judgment or to pronounce said sentence; that the same are in excess of the jurisdiction of the court and are nullities.”
The return to the writ shows that petitioner is imprisoned by virtue of a commitment issued out of the superior court of the state of California in and for the county of San Bernardino in the following form: “The district attorney, with the defendant, who had heretofore…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- In re VoightWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Nieves González v. JonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
- People v. GrilloMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.