Legal Opinion
Nolan Bros. v. United States ex rel. Fox Bros. Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1959No. 6004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
Brought within the framework of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., the United States instituted this action for the use and benefit of Fred F. Fox, W. L. Fox, T. O. Burch, and Ham Canada, doing businéss as a joint venture under the name of Altus Construction Co., hereinafter referred to as Altus, against Nolan Bros., Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Minnesota,, hereinafter referred to as Nolan, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Connecticut, hereinafter referred to as the Indemnity Company. The substance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daniel v. Board of Trade of City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, a Corporation v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Davis v. Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Lovell v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- First State Bank of Canute v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nolan Bros., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Kennedy, John P. v. Venrock AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Children's Shelter, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985