Legal Opinion

United States v. Jimenez-Perez

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 18, 2011No. 10-3757PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Baltazar Jimenez-Perez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States subsequent to removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). At sentencing, Jimenez-Perez moved for a downward variance to compensate for an allegedly unwarranted sentencing disparity precipitated by the unavailability of a “Fast Track” early-disposition program in the Eastern District of Missouri, where authorities indicted him. The district court, citing a lack of “definitive” guidance from our court on this issue, denied Jimenez-Perez’s motion for a downward variance, reasoning that it lacked…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Gomez-HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Lopez-MaciasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Elodio-BenitezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Jose Ruiz-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. GUNASEKERA v. IrwinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. United States v. Hector Galvez QuebedoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API