Legal Opinion

State v. Jacks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1989No. 55415PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ann McManamon, Chief Justice.

John Jacks timely appeals his conviction for the murder (R.C. 2903.02) of Carl May. Jacks raises eleven assignments of error. 1 Because we find the prosecutor committed reversible error during his cross-examination of Jacks and his closing arguments, and the court improperly instructed the jury, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

It is undisputed that on the evening of October 12, 1987, Jacks, May, Phillip Knox and Sam Hodge gathered on a vacant lot on Cleveland’s east side. During the evening the men consumed beer and wine while warming themselves around a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API