Legal Opinion

State v. Frazier

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. 94-681PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

R.C. 2929.05(A) mandates that we undertake a three-prong analysis when reviewing a capital case. First, we must consider the specific issues raised by the appellant with regard to the proceedings below. Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances in this case against any mitigating factors. Third, we must independently consider whether appellant’s sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in other similar cases.

For the reasons that follow, we uphold appellant’s conviction and affirm the sentence of death.

I. Jury Issues

A. Voir Dire

In Propositions of Law IV and V…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GetsyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API