Heggblom v. John Wanamaker New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
This is a motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing the amended complaint herein upon the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The causes of action are grounded in alleged breach of warranty (first cause of action) and alleged negligence (second cause of action). In brief the facts are that in February or March, 1937, one Hilda Gunell" (who is not a party to this action) purchased in the defendant’s retail, department store a reducer and health exerciser known by the trade name of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Nichols v. Clark, MacMullen & Riley, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SchriverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Naples v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Ex Parte Hospital Espanol De Auxilio Mutuo De Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.