Legal Opinion
D.B. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, Department of Workforce Development, and Anderson Transit System, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 5, 2013No. 93A02-1301-EX-71PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
David Ball, et al., and Anderson Transit System, Inc. ("Anderson Transit") (collectively, "Claimants") appeal from the decision of the Review Board ("the Board") of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development ("the Department"), which denied Claimants' application for unemployment compensation under the Indiana Employment Security Act ("the Act"). See Ind.Code § 22-4-1-1, et seq.
We affirm.
Issue
Claimants raise numerous issues on appeal. We consolidate these into a single issue, whether the Board's construction of Indiana Code section 22-4-3-5, which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClain v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Chrysler Group, LLC v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Recker v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep't of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Adams v. Rev. Bd. Ind. Emp. SEC. Div.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Indiana State University v. LaFiefIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consumer Attorney Services, P.A., The McCann Law Group LLP, and Brenda L. McCann, Individually and as Owner and/or Officer of Consumer Attorney Services, P.A. v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- James Broxton v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, the Department of Indiana Workforce Development, and SodexoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gann v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
- Vassil Marinov v. Review Board of the Department of Workforce Development (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017