Legal Opinion

In Re Bicoastal Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 20, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIE, Chief Justice:

In this case the Court is called upon to decide whether the exercise of a secured creditor’s right to elect a majority of the board of directors of its debtor was a valid corporate act under the circumstances here present. The creditor’s election right was created as part of a complex scheme to protect its substantial investment in the debtor, and it was agreed that it would be triggered upon the failure by the debtor to repay its debt by a specified date. Although the exercise of its election right was delayed by an intervening order of the United States District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Judah v. Delaware Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Waggoner v. LasterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. Wood v. Coastal States Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Gaskill v. Gladys Belle Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
  5. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Aveta Inc. v. CavallieriCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  3. In Re Explorer Pipeline Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2001
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Iridium Africa Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  5. Pearson v. Component Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API