Legal Opinion

Sumes v. Andres

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 9, 1996No. Civil Action 94-1796 (HHG)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

This case came before the Court for a bench trial beginning on February 20, 1996 and concluding on February 21, 1996. With the benefit of the full record now before the Court, including Proposed Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law filed by both plaintiff and defendant, this ease is ripe for a decision on the merits.

I

This case involves claims under the section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 1-2519. 1 Because the parties sharply contest the factual background of this ease,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Doe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  4. Glanz v. VernickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  5. RAP, Inc. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nieves-Marquez v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Lesley v. Hee Man ChieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Ruskai v. PistoleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Boykin v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API