Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Bennett

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchenok, J.

This is a motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant Attorney-General from requiring the production by plaintiff, pending the determination of the action herein, of information as to his business and personal affairs and *152transactions as called for in certain subpoenas, on the ground that such information is beyond the authority of the defendant Attorney-General to require.

The Attorney-General is prosecuting an investigation of acts of the plaintiff under the Martin Act (General Business Law, art. 23-A). It is conceded that by virtue of that statute the Attorney-General is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Matter of Hirschfield v. . HanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In re MacNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API