In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 6, 2005
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant contends that the district court erred in concluding that recordings he made of conversations with a business colleague were not protected by attorney work product privilege, the Fifth Amendment, or attorney-client privilege. In this opinion, we hold that the district court did not err in concluding that while Appellant’s recordings were fact work product, the government established that the grand jury had a substantial need for the recordings and that the information contained on them could not be obtained through other means. In a separate summary…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lujan v. Cabana Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Koumoulis v. Independent Financial Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Favors v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Costabile v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.