Legal Opinion

Havana Electric R., L. & P. Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 21, 1934No. Docket Nos. 40304, 42570, 47339Published

1. Taxes paid to the Municipality and Province of Havana, Cuba, by the petitioner, a New Jersey corporation, upon the doing of business in Havana, Cuba, can not be used as a credit on petitioner's liability for United States income taxes, although the amounts of the taxes were computed on the net earnings of the petitioner. 2. Where the statutory law of a foreign country has been introduced in evidence, the evidence of a duly qualified expert is competent and admissible for…

Read the full summary

1. Taxes paid to the Municipality and Province of Havana, Cuba, by the petitioner, a New Jersey corporation, upon the doing of business in Havana, Cuba, can not be used as a credit on petitioner's liability for United States income taxes, although the amounts of the taxes were computed on the net earnings of the petitioner. 2. Where the statutory law of a foreign country has been introduced in evidence, the evidence of a duly qualified expert is competent and admissible for the purpose of explaining its history and operation and assisting the Board in its proper construction, but the Board is…

1Opinion of the Court

HAVANA ELECTRIC RAILWAY, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Havana Electric R., L. & P. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 40304, 42570, 47339.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 1151; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1418;

February 21, 1934, Promulgated

1. Taxes paid to the Municipality and Province of Havana, Cuba, by the petitioner, a New Jersey corporation, upon the doing of business in Havana, Cuba, can not be used as a credit on petitioner's liability for United States income taxes, although the amounts of the taxes were computed on the net earnings of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Security Savings & Commercial Bank v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API