Legal Opinion

Quist v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1974No. 44268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

This action was commenced in the District Court of Hennepin County, the complaint alleging tortious interference with a contract for the sale of land in Anoka County described as the West one acre of Lot 7, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 84 (hereinafter Lot 7). Venue was subsequently transferred to the Anoka County District Court, and the complaint amended to claim a prescriptive easement over a closely situated lot described as Lot 5, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 84 (hereinafter Lot 5), owned by the defendant Fuller. The trial court, finding that there was an open, continuous,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. McKeon v. BrammerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Alvin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rice v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API