Legal Opinion

Marcus v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1984No. 83-318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Associate Judge:

Marcus was charged with second-degree burglary, D.C.Code § 22~1801(b) (1981); grand larceny, id. § 22-2205; and false pretenses, id. § 22-1301. A jury convicted him of the latter two offenses. Marcus’ claims on appeal are that the trial judge improperly amended the indictment through instructions to the jury, and erroneously ruled as to the permissible scope of cross-examination of his proffered character witnesses. We affirm the convictions, finding no error.

I

Marcus was in the business of buying and selling office equipment — primarily but not exclusively relating to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carr v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Crews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Askew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API