First National Bank v. Hughes
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Stanislaus County; William 0. Minor, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Fort Collins against George T. Hughes. From a judgment for defendant and an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
This is an action to recover upon a promissory note dated May 25, 1891, made by defendant George T. Hughes, for $700, payable to the order of Jesse Harris, three years after date, at the First National Bank, Fort Collins, Colorado, with interest, etc. Plaintiff sues as the indorsee and owner of the note. Defendant’s amended answer denies plaintiff’s ownership of the note, or that it was ever the lawful owner thereof, or that it was ever, for a valuable consideration or at all, assigned to plaintiff, or that he is indebted to plaintiff on account thereof. Further answering, defendant…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Denver Horse Importing Co. v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Crouch v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Citizens State Bank v. E. A. Tessman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Spaulding v. PittsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.