Legal Opinion · Concurrence
In re Evans
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1913No. 1227Published
Petition of D'avi-d Evans and Lindsay R. Rogers for a rebearing and a review and re-examination of the record and judgment in proceedings for their disbarmfent.
1ConcurrenceMcCARTY, C. J.
I concur. Rev. Stat. 1898, sec. 120, so far as material, provides:
“An attorney and counselor may be removed or suspended by the Supreme Court . . . for any of the following causes: .. . . . (1) His conviction of felony or misdemeanor, involving moral turpitude, in which case the record of conviction is conclusive evidence. (2) ■ . . . Any violation of the oath taken by him or of his duties as such attorney and counselor. . . . (5) For any other act to which such a consequence is by law attached.” Section 122
*318reads: “Proceedings to remove or suspend an attorney and counselor under tbe first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Croco v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Brown v. BignéOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Wood v. CasserleighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.