Legal Opinion
Rindal v. Seckler Co. Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 3, 1992No. CV-90-052-GFPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, Chief Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Dan Rindal, instituted the above-entitled action seeking monetary damages for the defendants’ purported breach of contract. Plaintiff’s complaint also asserts claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, constructive fraud, fraud and conversion, as well as a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. Plaintiff invokes the jurisdiction of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c).
Defendants Seckler Co. Inc. and Louis Dreyfus…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keystone, Inc. v. Triad Systems Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Stereo Gema, Inc. v. Magnadyne Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
- Miskovsky v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- FAYLE v. TSYS MERCHANT SOLUTIONS LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020
- Fayle v. TSYS Merchant Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.