France v. France
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
THIGPEN, Judge.
Brian France (“Plaintiff’) appeals from an order unsealing documents associated with the actions in this case. We find no abuse of discretion in the order of the trial court, which finds and concludes *571there has been a substantial change in circumstances. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court.
I. Facts
The evidence of record tends to show the following: Plaintiff and Megan France (“Defendant”) have been married to each other twice. Each marriage lasted approximately two years. Prior to their second marriage, on 27 December 2007, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johns v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Lippard v. HollemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024