Legal Opinion

Moore v. Stuart

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

The declaration in this action contained three counts. In the first the plaintiff counted on a note for $13,189.34 dated October 3, 1889, due December 3, 1893; in the second he counted on an agreement dated October 4, 1889, to pay that note and two other notes (one for $5,400 and the other for $5,426) before they fell due; and in the third he counted on an agreement dated January 17, 1896, extending payment of all three notes to January 1, 1899. The writ was dated November 2, 1904. The action was a joint action against both Mr. and Mrs. Stuart, and all the notes and agreements purported to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BuckleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Marshall v. MorisseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. LipsohnArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Moda v. Terminex International Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API