Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Lipsohn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1921No. Civil No. 1822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. E. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment against him for $8,219.63 and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.-

The complaint alleges in substance that I. J. Lipsohn, appellee, performed work, labor, and services for C. F. Ainsworth, appellant, at his instance and request, between the first day of October, 1911, and the first day of August, 1919, at an agreed salary of $100 per month, payable monthly, and that no portion of the amount earned- during this period, to wit, $9,500, has been paid, except the sum of $1,058.15, leaving a balance due and unpaid of $8,441.85.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Semmes v. Hartford Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Sterrett v. SweeneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Welton v. BoggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Carrutii v. PaigeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connor Livestock Co. v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Frederickson v. McIntyreArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Tucson Title Insurance v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Santos v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API