Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Holmes

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 30, 1888No. 209PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Bill in equity. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina.

A. bill in chancery was brought in that court by Isaac Tay-' lór, a citizen of the State of Massachusetts, and Sallie A. Howes, a citizen of the State of New Jersey, as they declare, “ for themselves individually^, each as a holder and owner of shares of the capital stock of the Gold Hill Mining Company, as well as for and. in behalf of all other stockholders of the said company who may desire hereafter to unite with them,” against Moses L. Holmes, Reuben J. Holmes, Ephraim Manney and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Clarke v. Boorman's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Matthews v. Headley Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API