Palmer v. City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
This action is brought to have declared invalid two -local assessments made by defendant against plaintiffs and to recover the sum of $624.82, paid thereon by plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
At the times involved herein the plaintiffs were the owners of two tracts of land fronting respectively on Onondaga avenue and upon Tallman street in the city of Syracuse. In 1893 proceedings were taken for the paving of each of said streets. Under the provisions of defendant’s charter said pavements could not be laid until water mains had been laid in said streets and connections made from the mains to the curb lines of the street. Formerly there had been provision for collecting the ex*562penses of laying such water connections of the private company which supplied the city with water. At the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tripler v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bruecher v. . Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Vanderbeck v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Lesster v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- McLean v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Morris v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906