Jackson v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
This action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq., filed 20 May 1959, presents a troublesome question of damages, made more difficult by the fact that plaintiff’s counsel and witnesses have gilded his claim with deliberate exaggerations which must be scraped off before the underlying metal can be assayed.
The claim is based upon the alleged negligence of the doctors at the U.S.P.H. S. Hospital in Baltimore, who left a part of a surgical needle in plaintiff’s abdomen during an operation in March 1954, and learned that the needle was there…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Paul Eugene Tessier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Jefferson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waldman v. RohrbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Mattingly v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Tramutola v. BortoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.