Legal Opinion
Lockard v. Parker
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1947No. 5646PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The principal question on this appeal is whether, as the District Judge found, there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Deputy Commissioner that the claimant was not entitled to any compensation in addition to that which he had already received for an injury suffered in the course of his employment by the Maryland Drydock Company. The applicable rule of law in such a case is that the findings of fact of the Deputy Commissioner and the inferences which he draws therefrom in cases under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- New York Evening Post Co. v. ChalonerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- In re PaulDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Shuler and Jerry Chatman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Direcotor, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Karl G. Eisen v. Philip J. PicardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- C. K. Case v. C. D. Calbeck, Deputy Commissioner, Eighth Compensation District of the U. S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California v. Lame Elk White HorseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Stagecrafters Club, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.