Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Buffalo Reinsurance Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1990No. 86 Civ. 3369 (JMC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendants’ motion. for summary judgment is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply memorandum in further opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied. Defendants’ cross-motion to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply memorandum as improperly submitted is granted. Defendants’ request for costs and attorneys’ fees in connection with the cross-motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Travelers Insurance Company [“Travelers”], seeks a' declaration that defendants are obligated to indemnify Travelers pursuant…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bayway Refining Company, Tosco Corporation, Counter v. Oxygenated Marketing and Trading A.G., CounterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Travelers Insurance v. Buffalo Reinsurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn LoebDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.