Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Rohrer

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 15, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

In an action at law, plaintiff’s declaration charges that defendants, including Wilburn P. Hughes, did “conspire, combine and confederate together” to falsely procure plaintiff to be charged with an offense against the laws of the United States, and that in pursuance thereof said defendants did cause a warrant to be issued against the plaintiff charging such offense, and caused the plaintiff to be brought before the United States commissioner for a hearing thereon, the result of which was that plaintiff was discharged for lack of probable cause; and that thereafter the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Mellon v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
  5. Semmes v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Block v. SassamanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API