California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. Schwarzenegger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
— In October 2005, California’s prison system reached a milestone that its facilities were ill equipped to handle. Prison inmates numbered 166,148, a historic high greatly exceeding the capacity for which the prisons were designed. It is undisputed that severe overcrowding of state prisons posed a serious threat to the health and safety of inmates, correctional officers, and the general public because it (1) heightened the risk of inmate violence against other inmates and prison staff, (2) caused power failures that jeopardized prison security, (3) resulted in sewage…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Atchley v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coleman v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- 640 Tenth, LP v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- 640 Tenth, LP v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Ghost Golf, Inc. v. NewsomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.