Legal Opinion

Howell v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 9, 1952No. 42466PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 S.W.2d 381 (1952)

HOWELL et ux.

v.

REYNOLDS et al.

No. 42466.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.

June 9, 1952.

Flynn and Parker, Francis C. Flynn, Norman C. Parker, St. Louis, for appellant.

Carroll J. Donohue, Salkey & Jones, St. Louis, for respondents.

HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge.

Plaintiffs-respondents brought this action in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in three counts against defendant-appellant and the remaining defendants as co-partners, allegedly doing business under the firm name of Afro-American Building Improvement. By their first count they sought to recover damages from…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Cosentino v. HeffelfingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Robinson v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Minihan v. AronsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Beckemeier v. BaesslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. EC Robinson Lumber Company v. LowreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Emerson v. TreadwayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Wilson v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Wyler Watch Agency, Inc. v. HookerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API