Legal Opinion
In Re Sealed Case
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 7, 1987No. 87-5208, 87-5209PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion Per Curiam.
2Per curiam
These consolidated appeals are taken from orders in a miscellaneous proceeding below collateral to a grand jury investigation. The government sought and obtained orders in the district court compelling appellants, a bank and an individual, to respond to a grand jury subpoena by producing documents and giving testimony. When appellants continued to refuse to respond to the grand jury’s demands, the court found appellants in contempt. The grand jury investigation has not been completed, and the records in the district court and this court have been sealed. In order to…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Banner Fund InternationalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Environmental Tectonics v. W.S. Kirkpatrick, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bankers Alliance Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.