Air Express International Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The merchandise covered by the two protests presently before the court, which have been consolidated for purposes of decision, consists of certain articles variously described as cocktail forks or cocktail picks. Upon importation into the United States from Peru, said articles were classified by *451the collector of customs as forks with handles of silver, within the provisions of paragraph 355 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 355), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 84 Treas. Dec. 403, T.D. 52373, supplemented by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Lilly & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Irvin Ware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Fred Roberts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amthor Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Viking Importrade, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967