Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Redstone
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 7, 2008PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.
At the center of this case are claims that Sumner M. Redstone and his brother, Edward, breached their fiduciary duties to their children in connection with the redemption of shares in a family business, National Amusements, Inc. (NAI), that Sumner and Edward at various times held in trust for their children. Sumner’s children are Brent and Shari; Edward’s children are Ruth Ann and Michael David (Michael). The plaintiffs are Michael and the current trustees of three trusts that once held shares in NAI for the benefit of Sumner’s and Edward’s children.
The plaintiffs commenced their action in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- In Re American Bridge Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Drakopoulos v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Cannonball Fund, Ltd. v. Dutchess Capital Management, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- DeGiacomo v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.