Harden v. Peck
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Brady Harden, Bertha Harden and Michelle Harden 1 , filed an amended complaint against the defendants, all of whom are Chicago police officers, seeking compensatory damages under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 for alleged violations of their constitutional rights as secured by the fourth, sixth 2 , and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. The defendants, Officers Richard Peck (“Peck”), Erasmo Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”), Kathleen Brannigan (“Brannigan”) and Claude Posilovich (“Posilovich”), have moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. AvilaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Emerson v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Kaufmann v. SaariDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Nazarenus v. J.F. Daley International, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Wells Fargo v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026