Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Brock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In this jurisdiction the right to contest a will by caveat is given by statute; and the procedure to be followed is outlined in the statute conferring the right, G.S. 31-32, 31-33, et seep It is not a civil action, as classified in the Code of Civil Procedure, but a special proceeding in rein leading to the establishment of the will as a testamentary act under the issue devisavil vel non. In re Haygood's Will, 101 N. C. 574, 578, 8 S. E. 222; In re Will of Westfeldt, 188 N. C. 702, 125 S. E. 521; Bailey v. McLain, 215 N. C. 150, 1 S. E. (2) 372; S. v. Me Glynn, 20 Cal. 233; Ex parte Re…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Bailey v. . McLainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Mills v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. In re Last Will & Testament of WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. In Re the Probate of the Will of HaygoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Will of CharlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. In Re the Will of CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. In re the Will of MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Matter of Will of HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. In Re the Last Will & Testament & First Codicil of AshleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API