McLeod v. Young
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Judge.
We have been given the privilege of pre-reading the able and thorough dissenting opinion prepared by our Associate, The Honorable Russell O. Morrow. It accurately contains, and we will not repeat, the facts and status of the appeal.
Appellants raise only two points on appeal, as follows:
I
The court committed reversible error in permitting the jury, over the appellants’ objections, to consider the pain and suffering on the part of the decedent in assessing damages to be awarded his estate.
II
The verdict was excessive based upon the lack of evidence relating to the prospective estate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Katz v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Threets v. HardisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Golden v. HarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Norman v. MullinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Solomon v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Solomon v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Farrand Corp. v. BectonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- McLeod v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Solomon v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976