Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Alloway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. 24315. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to certain real estate. The defendant May Allo-way made claim to the property on two grounds: (1) that the property was a homestead and, therefore, not subject to sale under execution; (2) that it was her separate property and, therefore, not subject to execution upon a judgment for a community debt. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law adverse to plaintiff, and thereupon entered its decree dismissing the complaint and quieting title to the land in the defendant May Alloway as her sole and separate property. The plaintiff has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hookway v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Edson v. KnoxWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In Re Deaver's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Washburn v. WilenWashington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Anacortes v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Pekola v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Shemilt v. SturosWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Coopman v. Citizens State Bank of OmakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. In re MapesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API