Legal Opinion

Rion v. Ault

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 24, 1972No. Patent Appeal No. 8591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Ault et al., the senior party.1 Rion et al.2 appeal solely as to an issue which they assert, and which Ault denies, is ancillary to priority as hereinafter explained. We reverse and remand because we find there is no interference in fact.

The Counts

The parties’ inventions are both in the field of making vitreous enamels such as are applied to bathroom fixtures, kitchen sinks, and the like having a cast iron base. The counts recite a method of making a titania-opacified porcelain enamel frit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Harrison D. Brailsford v. Marius Jean Lavet and Jacques Jean Gustave DietschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Ray v. KronmillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  5. Howard C. Ludwig v. Jesse S. Sohn and Harold RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Squires v. CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Rion v. AultCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API