Legal Opinion
Snap-On Tools Corp. v. Rice
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 11, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 88-0375PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff/appellant Snap-On Tools Corporation (Snap-On) appeals from the trial court’s granting of defendant/appellee Randy Rice’s motion to quash provisional remedy. Because Rice acquired property for value and without actual knowledge of Snap-On’s unperfected security interest therein, we affirm the trial court.
FACTS
Snap-On sold tools to Larry Neal, who operated a tire business in Benson, Arizona. The goods included an air compressor and wheel balancer and were sold pur suant to purchase money security agreements. Snap-On did not perfect its interest in these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whittemore v. AmatorArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- The Southland Corporation, a Texas Corporation v. Emerald Oil Company, Etc., and Charles E. Thomas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Broadway National Bank v. G & L Athletic Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Clark Oil & Refining Co. v. LiddicoatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. Aron & Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Mur-Ray Management Corp. v. Founders Title Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Webb v. Interstate Land Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- First American Title Insurance Co. v. Action Acquisitions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007