Legal Opinion
Jose Tzompantzi-Salazar v. Merrick Garland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2022No. 20-71514PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE TZOMPANTZI-SALAZAR, No. 20-71514 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A200-196-389 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 21, 2021 * Pasadena, California Filed February 9, 2022 Before: Ryan D. Nelson and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Karen E. Schreier, ** District Judge. Opinion by Judge VanDyke * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Selamawit Zehatye v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Delgado-Ortiz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kwang Park v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Singh v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- D-G-E-A- & N-G-G-EBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- F-B-ABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Gutierrez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.