Kane v. Harris & Co. Advertising
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Chief Judge.
This cause arises out of a post-final judgment order entered by the trial court, refusing to permit the appellants to prevail on_ what they styled “Motion to Intervene and for Distribution of Collateral Funds”. The facts giving rise to this motion are as follows :
Some time in I960, the appellee, Harris and Company Advertising, Inc., sought a judgment against the Republic of Cuba. *671Some time in 1961, the appellants sought to recover a judgment against the Republic of Cuba in an independent law action. By the spring of 1961, the creditors of the Republic of Cuba had reduced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Henderson v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Warshaw-Seattle, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Bradstreet v. CrosbieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.