Legal Opinion

Kane v. Harris & Co. Advertising

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 3, 1964No. 63-619Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Chief Judge.

This cause arises out of a post-final judgment order entered by the trial court, refusing to permit the appellants to prevail on_ what they styled “Motion to Intervene and for Distribution of Collateral Funds”. The facts giving rise to this motion are as follows :

Some time in I960, the appellee, Harris and Company Advertising, Inc., sought a judgment against the Republic of Cuba. *671Some time in 1961, the appellants sought to recover a judgment against the Republic of Cuba in an independent law action. By the spring of 1961, the creditors of the Republic of Cuba had reduced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Henderson v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Warshaw-Seattle, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Bradstreet v. CrosbieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API