Legal Opinion

Commercial Union Insurance v. Burt Thomas-Aitken Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 5, 1967Published

1Opinion of the Court

49 N.J. 389 (1967)

230 A.2d 498

COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

BURT THOMAS-AITKEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND PROSPECT PARK NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 13, 1967.

Decided June 5, 1967.

Mr. Reginald F. Hopkinson argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Jeffer, Walter and Tierney, attorneys).

Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mrs. Sonia Napolitano, on the brief; Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell and Foley, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Bell & Coggeshall Co. v. Kentucky Glass Works Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Burt Thomas-Aitken Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API