Legal Opinion

State v. Bengtson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Defendant was convicted of embezzlement and appeals. There are several assignments of error. We will relate the material facts and then consider the assignments. The facts are not materially disputed. The basic contentions concern the application of the law to the facts.

The indictment charged:

“The said O. H. Bengtson on or about the 21st day of October, 1959, in the said County of Jackson and State of Oregon, then and there being, and then and there being an officer of Medford Escrow Company, Inc., a corporation, there did then and there come into his possession and be under his care by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . MeadowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. GermainOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BengtsonOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. SuttlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. AltigOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. BengtsonOregon Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API