Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Util. Comm'n v. Cooper, Att'y Gen.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 2015No. 347A14PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the North Carolina Utilities Commission (the Commission) properly concluded that it is in the public interest to allow Aqua North Carolina (Aqua) to utilize a rate adjustment mechanism of the type described in section 62-133.12 of the North Carolina General Statutes. We conclude that the Commission’s determination was based upon sufficient findings of fact and was supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence in view of the entire record. See N.C.G.S. § 62-94 (2013). Accordingly, we affirm.

Aqua is a public utility that provides…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission & Duke Power Co. v. EddlemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public StaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of N.C. v. Envtl. Working Grp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  2. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  3. State v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023
  4. Vill. of Bald Head Island v. Bald Head Island Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API