State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The first assignment of error presented by the Attorney General and the Public Staff states that the Commission erred in granting Glendale a $34,883 annual increase in revenues when it found as a fact that Glendale has failed to provide adequate water service. The Commission’s order contains these findings in pertinent part:
6. Under present rates, the Applicant’s annualized level of operating revenue is $111,348. Under the Applicant’s proposed rates, the annualized level of operating revenue would be $163,859. Under the Commission’s approved rates, the annualized level…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. AT&T Communications of the Southern States, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. North Carolina PowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.