Legal Opinion
Cobell v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 14, 2001No. CIV. A. 96-1285(RCL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Department of the Treasury’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal (“Motion to File Under Seal”), the Motion of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. to Intervene and For Access to Documents Filed Under Seal On November 2, 2001 (“Motion to Intervene and For Access”); Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion (“Plaintiffs’ Opposition”); Treasury’s Response to the Oppositions Filed by Dow Jones and Plaintiffs (“Treasury Response”); and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Ad Hominem Sanctions and Award of Expenses Regarding the Motion (“Motion for Sanctions”).…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Naegele v. AlbersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Zapp v. Zhenli Ye GonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.