Legal Opinion

Wota v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Colorado

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1991No. 90CA1661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

Plaintiffs, Michael and Virginia Wota, appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were insured by Blue Cross under a prepaid group health plan. The policy included coverage of major medical and surgical benefits according to the terms of the membership certificate. Relevant portions here include the introduction, which states, in pertinent part:

“The last part of each individual ‘BENEFITS’ section lists the limitations and exclusions to that particular service which are most important for you to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Urtado v. ShupeColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WangerinColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Imperial Contractors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wota v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Delmarva Health Plan, Inc. v. AcetoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  3. Erdenberger, Inc. v. Partek North America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API