Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Tannehill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 13, 1961No. Crim. No. 1573PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 Cal.App.2d 701 (1961)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

PHILLIP LEE TANNEHILL, Appellant.

Crim. No. 1573.

California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist.

July 13, 1961.

Phillip Lee Tannehill, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

COUGHLIN, J.

On October 5, 1954, by two separate informations filed in the Superior Court of Orange County, the defendant was charged with the crimes (1) of taking an automobile without the consent of the owner, allegedly occurring on September 26, 1954,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People v. AyalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. VaitonisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Cradduck v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. BlevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API