Legal Opinion
Cosa Instrument Corporation v. Hobré Instruments Bv
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 26, 2010No. 1:09-mj-00175PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
On February 24, 2010, following a default by the Defendant Hobré Instruments BV (“Hobré”), United States Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay issued a Report and Recommendation finding that Cosa Instrument Corporation (“Cosa”) and Xentaur Corporation (“Xentaur”) (collectively “the Plaintiffs”) were not entitled to the declaratory and injunctive relief or the attorneys’ fees that they requested in connection with Hobré’s default. Presently before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ appeal of that Report. For the reasons set forth below, Judge Lindsay’s Report is affirmed in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Simmons v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DPC New York, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Hello I am Elliot, Inc. v. SineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Herman v. DuncanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019